Prince Harry’s absence from the Duchess of Kent’s funeral has sparked speculation about who stands where inside the monarchy. When senior members gathered at Westminster Cathedral, the moment was not just for mourning — the seating and what it symbolized caught equal attention. Despite years of scandal, Prince Andrew was welcomed by the royal family. On the other hand, Prince Harry was nowhere to be found.
Prince Harry was absent but Prince Andrew joined the rest of the royals for funeral, says source
Prince Harry’s absence and Prince Andrew’s presence at the royal funeral became measures of their position in the monarchy. The Duchess of Kent passed away, and Harry did not attend the funeral. Naturally, this fueled interest in where Harry stands in the royal family, especially since Andrew was in attendance with Sarah Ferguson after years of controversy.
Harry visited the UK in the days before the service. While palace insiders confirmed he had passed on condolences privately, his absence at the funeral was noticeable. According to Rob Shuter’s exclusive report on Substack, an insider remarked on the contrast. They said, “Andrew has been brought back into the fold for a public moment, yet Harry is missing entirely.”
The Prince and Princess of Wales joined King Charles to lead the mourners, but Queen Camilla missed the service due to being sick. The Duchess of Kent had converted to Catholicism in the 1990s and requested a full Requiem Mass. However, what lingered in discussion afterwards was the Duchess’s faith and the message behind who represented the family that day.
Notably, Andrew is slowly being allowed moments of visibility. At the same time, Harry, also the King’s younger son, remains excluded from the royal family’s ceremonial duties. Prince Harry’s absence from the funeral may have been quietly agreed upon, but sources suggest it underlines his uncertain role in the monarchy. He is not cut off entirely, but he is not brought into the fold when the family steps out together.
