Taylor Swift is reportedly taking no chances when it comes to protecting her massive fortune ahead of her wedding to NFL star Travis Kelce. The Grammy-winning singer is reportedly finalizing an “ironclad” prenup agreement designed to safeguard her $1.6 billion empire, and Kelce is “fully supportive” of the move.
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce working on prenup, insiders say
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce announced their engagement in a joint Instagram post that took the internet by storm. While fans are still waiting for wedding details, insiders told RadarOnline.com that lawyers on both sides are already deep in negotiations over a comprehensive prenup.
“Taylor’s been upfront from day one with Travis that being in love doesn’t mean being careless,” said a source close to the pop star. “She’s poured decades of sweat into building her career and fortune, and she wants to make sure it’s secure, no matter how head-over-heels they are. And Travis gets that completely – he admires how driven she is and believes it’s important they both stay financially independent,” the source added.
The insider described the contract as “ironclad,” covering everything from Swift’s music masters and trademarks to her real estate holdings and creative control. “She’s seen how other stars have lost fortunes in complicated splits. For her, it’s about being practical, not pessimistic,” the source further stated.
Legal experts reportedly suggest that such detailed agreements can take months to finalize, potentially delaying Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding date. Both Swift and Kelce have high-profile attorneys involved due to the size of their respective estates, as Kelce’s net worth reportedly stands at around $70 million.
Despite the legal complexity, sources say Kelce has no issue with Swift’s approach. “Travis is clearly doing very well for himself,” said one insider, adding, “There’s no jealousy here – he really respects how sharp she is when it comes to business.”
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s prenup reportedly includes mutual clauses on privacy and non-disclosure, ensuring neither star’s reputation suffers if the relationship ever ends.
Originally reported by Devanshi Basu on Mandatory.
