Piper Rockelle, who rose to fame as a child influencer on YouTube, has now joined OnlyFans, to a thunderous and controversial response. While her popularity soars and allegations continue about her faking her first day’s earnings for virality, Rockelle claims that it is not all about money for her in the first place. The subject of Netflix’s Bad Influence opened up about the reason she joined OnlyFans in a new interview.
Piper Rockelle shares why she joined OnlyFans
Since her OnlyFans debut on the first day of 2026, Piper Rockelle has been one of the most talked-about figures. There has already been a huge controversy about her faking her first day’s earnings. She claimed were more than $2.5 million. This information has dragged in other creators and influencers in the conversation, as well.
Rockelle spoke in detail with Rolling Stone about her new controversial venture and claimed that it was not “100 percent about money” for her. After she answered a question about how long she planned to be on OnlyFans. She answered what being on OnlyFans meant to her, and it was not only for the money. “I think it’s about just proving everyone wrong. You guys have been telling me [not] to do this one thing that has gotten me to where I want to be,” Rockelle revealed. She continued, “This has gotten me to help my animals. This has gotten me to help my family. I’ve retired my grandma. I’ve paid off her house.”
She further added, “The people who have taken time to bash me on the internet and say that I’ve been exploited my whole entire life.” And continued, “I did this and this and this and this, they can’t turn around and become an OnlyFans model.”
Rockelle continued, “They can’t do that because they’ve preached their whole entire lives about not exploiting yourself and not showing off your body. It’s just proving everybody wrong.” She concluded, “Maybe in a few years, I’ll be like, F**k, I shouldn’t have done that. But you’re supposed to live with no regrets. So, that’s what I’ve been trying to do.”
Originally written by Sourav Chakraborty on Mandatory.
