Megyn Kelly recently shared her thoughts on Nancy Guthrie’s case. On “The Megyn Kelly Show,” she welcomed two security experts to discuss the evidence related to the alleged kidnapper. Furthermore, the 55-year-old questioned why the possible suspect targeted Nancy’s house, which “wasn’t even the nicest.”
For those unversed, Savannah Guthrie’s mom went missing from her Tucson home on February 1. The police reportedly suspected it to be a kidnapping case after the FBI released footage of a masked man outside the 84-year-old’s door.
Megyn Kelly questions why Nancy Guthrie’s kidnappers didn’t target nicer homes than hers
Megyn Kelly questioned why the alleged kidnapper targeted Nancy Guthrie’s home. At the beginning of last month, the “Today Show” co-anchor’s mother went missing from her residence in Tucson, Arizona. Several reports quoted the police, especially the county sheriff, sharing information about the ongoing case.
Meanwhile, broadcasters like Kelly came forward to discuss the details openly. On “The Megyn Kelly Show,” she invited security experts Will Geddes and James Hamilton to break down the evidence regarding Nancy’s possible suspect. She found it questionable that the alleged kidnapper didn’t target nicer homes than Nancy’s.
“The neighborhood has got a lot nicer homes than Nancy’s. So if you’re going to go in there and target somebody, why would you go to her house?” — Kelly wondered. Furthermore, she explained her doubts, asking whether the potential suspect had conducted “surveillance of the house.” According to her, Nancy was not a “world traveler,” but an elderly lady who always stayed home. On top of that, there had reportedly been no ransom calls.
Kelly also pointed out that she would want to find out the “evidence,” the “mistakes,” and some things they “left behind.” As per her opinion, the sheriff, who has been informing the public and media about the case, has reportedly been the “most sophisticated investigator.” Kelly added, “With all due respect to the sheriff, I don’t have any confidence in him.”
