Affordable fashion finds continue to dominate social media, and the latest buzz centers around a possible dupe to Kim Kardashian’s popular SKIMS sleepwear. A TikTok video has sparked interest by suggesting that a high street retailer may offer a similar look at a fraction of the price. While the claim has not been independently verified, it has quickly gained traction among shoppers looking for budget-friendly options.
Primark has a cheaper alternative to SKIMS PJ, claims TikToker
According to a TikTok creator, Primark may offer a lower-cost alternative to Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS pyjamas. Content creator Chloé Evelyn Taylor recently shared a video claiming she found a dupe that closely resembles the well-known loungewear set. Her review highlighted both the design and the price difference.
“Sorry Kim K, you’re gonna hate me, but Primark have Skims pyjama dupes, and they’re good too,” she said in the video, while trying on a grey set. She described the fabric as “soft,” “light,” and “ribbed,” noting that the pieces also include practical details like pockets. While she mentioned that the bottoms appeared “a little bit see-through,” she suggested that it may not be a major concern for sleepwear.
Taylor also pointed out that the fit runs slightly oversized, sharing that she chose different sizes for the top and bottoms to get her preferred look. Despite calling the set “not that cheap,” she emphasized the price gap compared to SKIMS. According to her, the Primark version costs £14 per piece, bringing the total to £28, significantly lower than the reported £136 price of the original.
She later showed a second version in black and encouraged viewers to act quickly, claiming limited stock in stores. “If you’re gonna get these, you’ve got to get in quick,” she said.
The video also sparked mixed reactions in the comments. Some viewers expressed excitement, with one writing, “Omg I need this,” while others questioned rising prices at budget retailers. Taylor responded to one comment by clarifying she initially thought the set was priced together, but realized each piece was sold separately.
