Blac Chyna’s latest court filing has pulled the curtain back on a confidential agreement she once required an ex-boyfriend to sign. The newly revealed document includes sweeping privacy rules and a $5 million penalty for anyone who allegedly violates its terms.
The filing surfaced as Chyna’s legal dispute with Twin Hector continues. Both have accused each other of abuse since ending their relationship.
Blac Chyna’s legal filing outlines broad confidentiality terms and multimillion-dollar penalties
According to TMZ, Chyna submitted a copy of the non-disclosure agreement to the court while fighting with Twin Hector. The outlet reported that Hector signed the document during their relationship, giving the public its first detailed look at the contract.
The agreement covered far more than Chyna’s personal life. It stated that Hector could learn confidential information about her business activities, private affairs, and family. It also extended protections to her children, King Cairo and Dream Kardashian, as well as her mother, Tokyo Toni.
The filing outlined strict limits on what Hector could do with that information. According to the report, the agreement prohibited him from filming Chyna without her permission. It also barred him from discussing anything he learned during their relationship.
Perhaps the biggest surprise involved the financial consequences. The document included a clause requiring the person who violated the agreement to pay $5 million in liquidated damages. The outlet noted that a court would ultimately decide whether that amount could legally stand if someone challenged the provision.
Chyna and Hector have traded accusations in court since their relationship ended in 2023. Their latest dispute has now shifted attention from those allegations to the confidentiality agreement itself.
The document also highlights how celebrities often try to protect their privacy beyond traditional public relations strategies. In this case, the agreement reached beyond Chyna’s own life and included people closest to her, including her children and mother.
Whether the NDA ultimately carries legal weight remains unclear. However, the filing offers a rare look at the kind of private agreements that sometimes exist behind high-profile relationships. As the case moves forward, the court will likely determine whether any of the contract’s provisions become central to the dispute.
TELL US – DO YOU THINK CELEBRITIES SHOULD REQUIRE ROMANTIC PARTNERS TO SIGN STRICT NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS?
