A long-running legal battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt is once again making headlines, this time over disagreements about when their case should go to trial. The former couple remains locked in a complex dispute over their French winery. Although both sides appear eager to move forward, a new report suggests they are at odds over the timeline. The latest filings reveal contrasting views on how quickly the case should proceed.
Angelina Jolie calls out Brad Pitt’s request for early trial date in winery battle, per report
According to court documents cited by TMZ, Angelina Jolie has pushed back against Brad Pitt’s request to schedule the trial earlier than currently proposed. Pitt originally filed the lawsuit in 2022. Now, he is said to be advocating for a quicker timeline, reportedly aiming for an April 2027 date.
The dispute centers around Château Miraval, the former couple’s shared winery in France. Pitt has alleged that Jolie sold her stake in the business to a third party without his consent. However, Jolie previously disputed the claim, stating she did not require his approval for the transaction.
In recent filings, Pitt reportedly argued that delaying the trial has affected his ability to enjoy the property. He is said to have claimed he has been lacking “the quiet enjoyment” of the estate, and also raised concerns about aging witnesses. According to the report, he noted that one potential witness has already passed away.
Jolie, however, appears to disagree with the need for haste. In her response, she reportedly argued that a later trial date, around September 2027, would be reasonable. She also claimed that Pitt has not provided sufficient evidence to support his concerns about disruptions caused by the ongoing litigation.
The “Maleficent” actress is also said to have challenged other aspects of Pitt’s argument. For instance, she reportedly questioned his claim that scheduling conflicts, including the Jewish High Holidays, would interfere with a later trial. Per the filing, Pitt did not specify which members of his legal team would be affected.
Despite the ongoing disagreement, no final decision has been made regarding the trial date. A judge is yet to rule on the matter, leaving the timeline uncertain for now.
