Donald Trump Faces Rejection from Court Over 10% Tariff
Photo Credit: Kent NISHIMURA | AFP via Getty Images

Donald Trump Faces Rejection from Court Over 10% Tariff

A federal court recently rejected the 10 percent tariffs that Donald Trump imposed on US imports. This comes after the Supreme Court struck down many of his tariffs in February. After this ruling by the Supreme Court, the President announced that he would raise pre-existing tariffs.

Federal court says Donald Trump’s 10% tariff impose is illegal

According to a new report, a federal court has ruled that the 10 percent tariffs the two-time President imposed on imports are unlawful.

As per CNN, the judges of the US Court of International Trade, in their ruling, asserted that the Trump administration made an illegal use of the 1974 trade law to impose the tariffs. Moreover, they instructed the administration to refund the plaintiffs’ payments and to stop collecting these tariffs. The judges also described Donald Trump’s tariffs as aggressive.

Meanwhile, Trump gave a statement on the ruling on Thursday and said, “Nothing surprises me with the courts. Nothing surprises me, so we always do it a different way. We get one ruling, and we do it a different way.”

Notably, Section 122 allows a government to impose 15 percent tariffs without any approval from Congress. However, in Trump’s case, the judges felt the argument made by his administration was not quite sufficient to carry forward the tariffs. Thus, leading to their decision.

Donald Trump imposed these tariffs after the Supreme Court ruled out his import taxes on foreign trade partners. According to The Hill, he said in a press conference at the White House at that time, “In order to protect our country, a President can actually charge more tariffs than I was charging in the past period of a year under the various tariffs authorities. “So we can use other of the statutes, other of the tariff authorities, which have also been confirmed and are fully allowed.”

It must be noted that importers can apply for refunds. Nevertheless, it is currently uncertain when they will be applicable for all payments.

Originally reported by Ishita Verma on Mandatory.

TRENDING
X