Jennifer Aniston was reportedly “deeply worried” about Brad Pitt after his recent candid interview. The “Friends” alum was said to believe her boyfriend, Jim Curtis, could help her ex-husband process old pain. Curtis, a hypnotherapist and spiritual coach, had already become part of Aniston’s own healing work. The claim framed her concern as support, not judgment, after Pitt publicly discussed sobriety, pressure, and personal lows.
Jennifer Aniston reportedly turns to Jim Curtis over Brad Pitt concerns
According to a HeatWorld report, a source claimed that Jennifer Aniston still cared about Brad Pitt. The insider said, “Jen still cares deeply for Brad.” They added that she knew him “so well” and saw he was “really suffering.”
The source said she wanted to help him access “the tools” that helped her. They also claimed the work involved trauma, the past, and learning “how to let things go.”
Meanwhile, the report said Aniston had been dating Jim Curtis for just over a year. The pair reportedly met through mutual friends. The actress had publicly praised his spiritual healing work as “extraordinary.”
She was also set to appear with him in New York in September. The live Q&A was tied to his book, “The Book Of Possibility: Release, Align, Become.”
However, the concern reportedly grew after Pitt’s recent Esquire interview. HeatWorld said the actor discussed drinking again after nearly a decade of sobriety. He also spoke about morbid thoughts and “oppressive pain” during a difficult period. The outlet linked that period to his 2016 split from Angelina Jolie. It also noted his later distance from his six children.
Still, the insider said Aniston believed Curtis could support him if he were open to it. The source said, “She believes Jim could really help Brad.” Another insider added that Curtis had “absolutely no qualms” about working with her ex-husband.
They said his heart “goes out to Brad.” However, the source added that Pitt would need to “totally surrender” to that process. For Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt, and Jim Curtis, the report framed the situation as a private concern rather than public criticism.
