Taylor Swift might end up paying the bills of her future husband, Travis Kelce. This will reportedly happen as per a prenup, predicted by an attorney. The notoriously private couple is all set to wed in the summer of this year. One of the topics that interests fans is a possible prenup between the couple, especially considering Swift’s net worth is far greater than Kelce’s. Notably, Swift was declared a billionaire by Forbes in 2024.
Attorney talks about Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce prenup
Attorney Sarah Luetto spoke to Page Six about Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s possible prenup. Notably, Luetto is neither affiliated with Swift nor Kelce and is a partner in Blank Rome’s Matrimonial & Family Law Group.
Luetto remarked, “When one party is worth significantly more than the other, prenuptial agreements frequently provide that the wealthier party will pay all of the couple’s living expenses while the less wealthy party preserves their separate estate.”
The lawyer explained that the agreements can possibly entail the wealthier person “gifting or transmuting a portion of their estate to the community or to the other party’s separate property.” This would allow “each party to maintain investments and assets during the marriage,” Luetto added.
The lawyer explained that Kelce and Swift both hold intellectual property and assets that cannot be simply divided. A well-crafted prenup will allow the couple to maintain their own estate.
Luetto elucidated, “It is likely that any prenuptial agreement would keep their respective estates entirely separate, regardless of any efforts made by either party to enhance the other’s estate during the marriage.” Luetto explained how Swift fought to regain her masters and claim ownership of her intellectual property.
The arrangement would make a dissolution “much simpler,” with both “retaining their own estate.”
Furthermore, Luetto predicted that their agreement may include terms that prevent them from jointly purchasing assets. The lawyer said, “They would simply need to clarify their ownership interests in any jointly held assets on a case-by-case basis.”
Moreover, Swift and Kelce may include terms to protect the peace and privacy of their relationship. This can possibly include “non-disparagement or non-disclosure terms related to their relationship,” as per Luetto.
Originally reported by Anwaya Mane on Mandatory.
